M15 Tianjin 2
Aug 11–16
🇦🇺 O. Jasika
The Final
Key Results
🇯🇵K. Ogura632🇦🇺O. Jasika✓776
🇦🇺M. Dellavedova6644🇯🇵K. Ogura✓3776
🇰🇷Y. Chung22🇦🇺O. Jasika✓66🇦🇺M. Dellavedova✓6177
🇯🇵S. Hazawa4663
🇨🇳F. Meng31🇰🇷Y. Chung✓66🇰🇷D. Lee52🇯🇵K. Ogura✓76
🇺🇸M. Jones30🇦🇺O. Jasika✓66Our Prediction Accuracy
| Round | Accuracy |
|---|---|
| 1/16-finals | 62% |
| 1/8-finals | 62% |
| Quarter-finals | 75% |
| Semi-finals | 50% |
| Final | 100% |
All Results
31 matchesFinal · 1 match
Accuracy: 100%🇯🇵K. Ogura632🇦🇺O. Jasika✓776Semi-finals · 2 matches
Accuracy: 50%🇰🇷Y. Chung22🇦🇺O. Jasika✓66🇦🇺M. Dellavedova6644🇯🇵K. Ogura✓3776Quarter-finals · 4 matches
Accuracy: 75%🇺🇸M. Jones30🇦🇺O. Jasika✓66🇰🇷D. Lee52🇯🇵K. Ogura✓76🇨🇳F. Meng31🇰🇷Y. Chung✓66🇦🇺M. Dellavedova✓6177🇯🇵S. Hazawa46631/8-finals · 8 matches
Accuracy: 62%
🇯🇵T. Yamanaka20🇯🇵S. Hazawa✓62🇰🇷Y. Chung✓776🇨🇳S. Qian654🇦🇺M. Dellavedova✓777🎾M. Shearer563🇰🇷D. Lee✓66
🇳🇿I. Becroft34🇰🇷J. Choe11🇦🇺O. Jasika✓63
🇨🇳T. Zhang11🇺🇸M. Jones✓66🇨🇳F. Meng✓66
🇦🇺A. Arcon24
🎾M. Haliak601🇯🇵K. Ogura✓1621/16-finals · 16 matches
Accuracy: 62%🎾M. Haliak✓66🇨🇳L. Liu22🇨🇳W. Kong32🇯🇵T. Yamanaka✓66🇯🇵K. Ogura✓373
🇯🇵Y. Kikuchi650🇦🇺M. Dellavedova✓66
🇦🇲D. Sarksian32🎾V. Tsirikidze24🇯🇵S. Hazawa✓66🇨🇳S. Qian✓366
🇯🇵Y. Kawahashi630🇳🇿I. Becroft✓4776🎾C. Ye6632🇭🇰K. Thompson363🎾M. Shearer✓677🇰🇷Y. Chung✓466🇨🇳X. Han624
🇯🇵Y. Mochizuki31🇨🇳F. Meng✓66🇰🇷C. Woo21🇦🇺O. Jasika✓66
🇹🇼T. Huang44🇰🇷D. Lee✓66🇦🇺A. Arcon✓26710
🇯🇵S. Imai6268🇨🇳T. Zhang✓76
🇦🇺J. Charlton54🇺🇸M. Jones✓677
🇹🇭W. Trongcharoenchaikul262🇰🇷J. Choe✓76🇨🇳F. Jiang53Draw · Final Results
1/16-finals
1/8-finals
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final
Venue & Surface Analysis
Hard — Hard courts sit between clay and grass: a true, medium-paced bounce that rewards all-round baseline quality. Form and consistency travel better here than on the more specialised surfaces.
A volatile draw — the higher-ranked player won only 63% of matches, so underdog value was plentiful. Biggest upset: K. Ogura (#815) def. M. Dellavedova (#299) — Semi-finals.
Tournament Records
| Longest Match | 32 games | K. Ogura def. M. Dellavedova 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4 · Semi-finals |
| Best Comeback | from a set down | K. Ogura def. Y. Kikuchi 3-6 7-5 3-0 · 1/16-finals |
| Most One-Sided | 6-2 2-0 | S. Hazawa def. T. Yamanaka · 1/8-finals |
Next Edition
M15 Tianjin 2 2027
Aug 10–15, 2027 · 324 days away — back on hard, with O. Jasika defending the title. Dates are projected from this edition and confirmed once the tour calendar is published.
Our experts publish predictions and value picks for every singles match as soon as the 2027 draw is released.
Frequently Asked Questions
What surface is M15 Tianjin 2 played on?
M15 Tianjin 2 is played on hard (outdoor).
Who won M15 Tianjin 2 2026?
O. Jasika won the title, defeating K. Ogura 7-6(7) 6-2.
Who was the runner-up at M15 Tianjin 2?
K. Ogura finished as runner-up, losing the final 7-6(7) 6-2 to O. Jasika.
When is the next M15 Tianjin 2?
The 2027 edition is expected Aug 10–15, 2027 — about 324 days from now. Dates are projected until the official tour calendar confirms them.
How did the matches play out?
Across 31 completed matches the average was 20.2 games, 74% finished in straight sets and 26% went the full distance, with 9 tiebreak sets played.
How accurate were the predictions?
Our experts went 20/31 (65% win rate) at this event.
M15 Tianjin 2 Predictions & Betting Tips
My Tennis Tips publishes data-driven predictions for every singles match at M15 Tianjin 2, a ITF ITF event played on hard. Our experts weight hard-court form, recent results, head-to-head history and market odds to produce a win probability and a value read for each match.
On hard courts, all-round baseline quality and consistency tend to dominate, which our experts capture through recent form and head-to-head data. Predictions are published as soon as the draw is released and updated with the latest odds on match day.
How to bet on M15 Tianjin 2
- Match winner — our headline pick for every singles match, with the fair odds our experts calculate alongside the bookmaker price so you can see the edge.
- Set betting and totals — hard shapes match length. At this edition 74% of matches finished in straight sets and the average match ran 20.2 games, which is the number to hold against any over/under line.
- Outright winner — the draw means seeding and section quality matter as much as form. Look for players whose game suits the conditions rather than the highest ranking.
- Underdogs — the higher-ranked player won 63% of matches here, so price your upsets accordingly.
Odds move quickly once a draw is released. We recompare prices on match day and only flag a value bet when our probability is meaningfully ahead of the implied bookmaker chance — never simply because a price looks big.