M25 Londrina
Aug 4–8
🇧🇷 F. Meligeni Alves
The Final
Key Results
🇧🇷F. Alves✓67
🇧🇷P. Santos35
🇦🇷M. Zeitune623🇧🇷F. Alves✓366🇧🇷P. Santos✓77377
🇦🇷C. Zarate64663🇨🇴J. Osorio41🇦🇷M. Zeitune✓66🇧🇷P. Santos✓776
🇨🇴S. Price632
🇧🇷G. Almeida12🇦🇷C. Zarate✓66🇧🇷F. Alves✓656🇧🇷J. Schiessl474Our Prediction Accuracy
| Round | Accuracy |
|---|---|
| 1/16-finals | 69% |
| 1/8-finals | 75% |
| Quarter-finals | 75% |
| Semi-finals | 50% |
| Final | 0% |
All Results
31 matchesFinal · 1 match
Accuracy: 0%🇧🇷F. Alves✓67🇧🇷P. Santos35Semi-finals · 2 matches
Accuracy: 50%🇧🇷P. Santos✓77377🇦🇷C. Zarate64663🇦🇷M. Zeitune623🇧🇷F. Alves✓366Quarter-finals · 4 matches
Accuracy: 75%🇧🇷F. Alves✓656🇧🇷J. Schiessl474🇧🇷G. Almeida12🇦🇷C. Zarate✓66🇧🇷P. Santos✓776🇨🇴S. Price632🇨🇴J. Osorio41🇦🇷M. Zeitune✓661/8-finals · 8 matches
Accuracy: 75%🇧🇷P. Santos✓646
🇧🇷N. Zanellato362🎾P. Dietrich361🇧🇷J. Schiessl✓646🇧🇷N. Oliveira22🇦🇷C. Zarate✓66
🇦🇷J. Estevez644🇨🇴J. Osorio✓466🇧🇷F. Alves✓7126
🇧🇷E. Kohlmann6104🇧🇷G. Almeida✓66🇧🇷V. Bini24🇨🇴S. Price✓366
🇧🇷J. Pereira633🎾G. Costa03🇦🇷M. Zeitune✓661/16-finals · 16 matches
Accuracy: 69%
🇧🇷E. Lima10🎾G. Costa✓63
🇧🇷R. Tosetto074🇨🇴J. Osorio✓656🇧🇷N. Zanellato✓66🎾L. Silva02🇧🇷A. Silva10🇧🇷N. Oliveira✓66
🇧🇷G. Schenekenberg7704🇦🇷C. Zarate✓6366🇦🇷I. Dreycopp11🇦🇷M. Zeitune✓66🇧🇷P. Santos✓636
🇧🇷W. Leite360🇦🇷J. Estevez✓66🇧🇷J. Lago02🎾G. Carvalho02🇧🇷E. Kohlmann✓66🎾S. Meneguetti43🇧🇷V. Bini✓66
🇦🇷L. Rodriguez44🇧🇷F. Alves✓66🎾P. Dietrich✓66🇧🇷K. Noatto32🇨🇴S. Price✓66🇦🇷T. Leston21🎾N. Villalon23🇧🇷J. Schiessl✓66
🇧🇷P. Sakamoto3🇧🇷G. Almeida✓6🇧🇷J. Pereira✓5
🇧🇷M. Alves2Draw · Final Results
1/16-finals
1/8-finals
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final
Venue & Surface Analysis
Clay — Clay is the slowest surface on tour. The ball bounces high and sits up, rallies run long and the serve is worth less — break points are more frequent and matches are decided by movement and stamina.
A volatile draw — the higher-ranked player won only 65% of matches, so underdog value was plentiful. Biggest upset: J. Osorio (#760) def. J. Estevez (#339) — 1/8-finals.
Tournament Records
| Longest Match | 35 games | P. Santos def. C. Zarate 7-6(7) 3-6 7-6(7) · Semi-finals |
| Best Comeback | from a set down | C. Zarate def. G. Schenekenberg 6-7(3) 6-0 6-4 · 1/16-finals |
| Most One-Sided | 6-1 3-0 | G. Costa def. E. Lima · 1/16-finals |
Next Edition
M25 Londrina 2027
Aug 3–7, 2027 · 317 days away — back on clay, with F. Meligeni Alves defending the title. Dates are projected from this edition and confirmed once the tour calendar is published.
Our experts publish predictions and value picks for every singles match as soon as the 2027 draw is released.
Frequently Asked Questions
What surface is M25 Londrina played on?
M25 Londrina is played on clay (outdoor).
Who won M25 Londrina 2026?
F. Meligeni Alves won the title, defeating P. A. Saraiva Dos Santos 6-3 7-5.
Who was the runner-up at M25 Londrina?
P. A. Saraiva Dos Santos finished as runner-up, losing the final 6-3 7-5 to F. Meligeni Alves.
When is the next M25 Londrina?
The 2027 edition is expected Aug 3–7, 2027 — about 317 days from now. Dates are projected until the official tour calendar confirms them.
How did the matches play out?
Across 31 completed matches the average was 19.8 games, 68% finished in straight sets and 32% went the full distance, with 5 tiebreak sets played.
How accurate were the predictions?
Our experts went 21/31 (68% win rate) at this event.
M25 Londrina Predictions & Betting Tips
My Tennis Tips publishes data-driven predictions for every singles match at M25 Londrina, a ITF ITF event played on clay. Our experts weight clay-court form, recent results, head-to-head history and market odds to produce a win probability and a value read for each match.
On clay, rally length and break-point conversion matter more than raw serve power, so our experts lean on surface-specific win rates and physical-endurance signals. Predictions are published as soon as the draw is released and updated with the latest odds on match day.
How to bet on M25 Londrina
- Match winner — our headline pick for every singles match, with the fair odds our experts calculate alongside the bookmaker price so you can see the edge.
- Set betting and totals — clay shapes match length. At this edition 68% of matches finished in straight sets and the average match ran 19.8 games, which is the number to hold against any over/under line.
- Outright winner — the draw means seeding and section quality matter as much as form. Look for players whose game suits the conditions rather than the highest ranking.
- Underdogs — the higher-ranked player won 65% of matches here, so price your upsets accordingly.
Odds move quickly once a draw is released. We recompare prices on match day and only flag a value bet when our probability is meaningfully ahead of the implied bookmaker chance — never simply because a price looks big.